Task 2: Some people think that governments should spend more money on sports facilities for training top athletes. Others argue that this money should be spent on sports facilities for ordinary people.
In allocating funds for sports facilities, governments face the dilemma of whether to prioritize resources for elite athletes or for the general public. While some advocate for increased investment in facilities tailored for training top athletes, others emphasize the importance of providing accessible sports amenities for ordinary individuals. This essay will explore both perspectives before advocating for a balanced approach to sports facility funding.
Proponents of allocating funds to facilities for elite athletes argue that such investments can boost national prestige and competitiveness on the global stage. Supporting top athletes with cutting-edge training facilities can lead to success in international sporting events, boost national pride, and inspire future generations to excel in sports. For example, countries such as China have made significant investments in elite athlete training facilities, resulting in Olympic dominance in sports such as gymnastics and diving. This has not only improved China’s international reputation but has also inspired younger generations to pursue careers in sports.
Proponents of investing in facilities for ordinary people, on the other hand, emphasize the broader societal benefits of encouraging widespread participation in sports. Accessible sports facilities can boost public health, promote community cohesion, and provide recreational opportunities for people of all ages and abilities, resulting in a healthier and happier society. For example, building community sports complexes with facilities for basketball, soccer, and swimming can encourage people to stay active and live healthier lifestyles.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments for both prioritizing sports facilities for elite athletes and for ordinary citizens, a balanced approach is essential.
- Facilities (n.) Cậ sở vật chất
- Elite (adj.): Ưu tú, chọn lọc
- Prioritize (v.) – Ưu tiên
- Proponents (n.): Những người ủng hộ
- Prestige (n.): Uy tín, danh tiếng
- Competitiveness (n.): Tính cạnh tranh
- Accessible (adj.): Dễ tiếp cận, dễ sử dụng
- Amenities (n.) – Tiện ích
- Cohesion (n.): Sự gắn kết, sự liên kết
- Recreational (adj.): Liên quan đến việc giải trí, giải trí
- Widespread (adj.): Phổ biến, lan rộng
- Harmony (n.): Sự hài hòa, sự cân đối
- Nurture (v.): Nuôi dưỡng, phát triển
- Talent (n.): Tài năng, khả năng
- Societal (adj.): Thuộc về xã hội, liên quan đến xã hội